Springfield, USA – In a wild courtroom twist that sounds like it was ripped from a low-budget spy flick, juror Daltonchaney1504 has spilled the tea on a federal criminal case where so-called “high-tech” Flock cameras were the star of the prosecution’s shaky evidence show. According to Daltonchaney1504, a whopping 90% of the state’s case leaned on these license plate-snapping cameras, but here’s the kicker: most of the images were about as reliable as a fortune cookie.
“The Flock cameras were a hot mess, misreading plates and bungling vehicle IDs left and right,” Daltonchaney1504 dished in an exclusive rant to anyone who’d listen. The jury, unimpressed by the glitchy tech, tossed the Flock evidence in the bin, relying instead on good ol’ human detective work—a photo snapped by a person at the suspect’s house and evidence from the crime scene itself sealed the deal. “The Flock stuff? Total garbage,” Daltonchaney1504 quipped.
But here’s where it gets spooky: those same wonky cameras were the key to scoring a warrant in the first place, raising eyebrows about just how much faith cops are putting in this dodgy tech. And it gets creepier. Daltonchaney1504 dropped a bombshell that left the jury gobsmacked: every time you cruise past a police car, it’s apparently playing paparazzi, auto-snapping pics of your vehicle—and even you, if you’re just strolling by on foot.
“We were all like, ‘What the heck?!’” Daltonchaney1504 said, recounting the jury’s collective freakout over this surveillance shocker. “It’s like we’re all living in a low-rent version of Minority Report, and nobody told us!” As concerns mount over the reliability of automated cameras and their creepy omnipresence, Daltonchaney1504’s tale is a wake-up call about the tech creeping into our lives—one blurry license plate at a time.
Source:
